Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of pets in EastEnders

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr 13 03:27, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of pets in EastEnders[edit]

Delete - a list of pets from a soap opera? There is no encyclopedic value here. Otto4711 14:04, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Its as important as a list of characters, as pets can be crucial to a plot a lot of the time. Keep. -Trampikey^{(talk)(contribs)} 14:15, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Trampikey is absolutely correct that TV series pets are inherently ... oh wait, no he's not. Delete Eusebeus 14:24, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- You may want to have a read of Wikipedia:Civility, when you get a chance. -Trampikey^{(talk)(contribs)} 14:26, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and without malice. --Evb-wiki 15:18, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If a pet is crucial to a plot then it may be considered a character and included in that list, but a list of pets is unwarranted. Arkyan  ^(talk) 16:06, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete with fire: Fails WP:NN, WP:NOT. The sets are crucial to the plot of shows a lot of the time too, but we don't see lists of those. (Heck, the costumes are often crucial. We don't see lists of them either.) RGTraynor 18:00, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Dalejenkins 18:16, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Although giggle-worthy, this has no encyclopedic value. Rolf, Abi Branning's gerbil, who was buried to the tune of "Bright Eyes" can be mentioned in the episode summary or the article for his mum. María (críticame) 18:23, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as an unencyclopedic directory of indiscriminate trivia. Seriously... talk about your indiscriminate information. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 18:35, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as fancruft. Useight 20:40, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge all entries with the articles of their respective owners. — AnemoneProjectors (zomg!) 22:37, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 10:08, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 10:08, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Quite a bit of indiscriminate info. Possibly merge into the character articles, if the animals in question are important to the story, and not just goldfish in the background of a set. --Phirazo 17:04, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:N and WP:V, as no asserted facts are cited to WP:RS. --Butseriouslyfolks 00:31, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.