Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people on the cover of Maxim magazine (US)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 11:59, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of people on the cover of Maxim magazine (US)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NLIST, Same kind of non-notable list List of people on the cover of Maxim magazine (India) was deleted recently Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people on the cover of Maxim magazine (India). Human3015^TALK 07:56, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 07:57, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 07:57, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 07:58, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It's a distinction to make the cover of Time, just possibly Rolling Stone as well. Maxim not so much. Nobody writes about it, except about the first man to do so.[1] Clarityfiend (talk) 09:34, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The notability of the magazine does not automatically convey notability to a list of people upon its cover - it requires reliable secondary sources providing coverage about this very specific topic, which appears to be lacking. Nwlaw63 (talk) 13:06, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above comments. ABF99 (talk) 02:38, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for lack of secondary coverage. Of course, notable exceptions exist (see also Idris Elba, et al), but those can be discussed at the main article for the publication. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 16:55, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.