Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of outlaw motorcycle club patches

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 06:43, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of outlaw motorcycle club patches[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unencyclopaedic. It is not a list in the classic sense on Wikipedia as none of the individual entries are wikilinks to articles. Tagged with multiple issues for a long time, none of which have been addressed. Article has no place on WIkipedia. Biker Biker (talk) 07:54, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Pointless article which somewhat suggests that all clubs follow the same patch-code. -- WikHead (talk) 10:08, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable in the least, and essentially unsourced. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:42, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above. Some of the more common ones could potentially be merged to Outlaw motorcycle club#Other patches, like the number "13", however this is a primarily unsourced glossary that is not necessary on its own. -Addionne (talk) 15:36, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Quite pointless overall, very little sourcing.— Preceding unsigned comment added by DARTH_SIDIOUS_2 (talk • contribs)
Delete Outlaw_motorcycle_club#Colors covers what is at least minimally sourced. This list expands that into completely fanciful territory.--Dbratland (talk) 16:54, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 21:11, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 21:11, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.