Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of one-word titles of conservative books

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 15:03, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of one-word titles of conservative books[edit]

Useless list. Why on earth would anyone want to read a list of books categorized by the length of their titles, let alone also categorized by their political viewpoints? Not to mention that the list is inaccurate, since every book on the list has a subtitle that extends the full title to multiple words. MysteryDog 17:47, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, or A vote to remove an article containing a biased, unmaintainable and pointless list. Peter Grey 18:58, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. Merchbow 19:10, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I agree, this list is useless. JIP | Talk 20:06, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - A much as I would love to keep a list of four books which managaes to include two Red-links I fear I cannot --Irishpunktom\^talk 21:47, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Listcruft would be a good one word title for a book. --Kinu ^t/_c 21:49, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Yup....Tombride 23:18, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 01:23, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no need for such a list. --Hectorian 01:38, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.