Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of notable people who regularly wear spandex

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete a1 empty/no context, WP:SNOW. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:11, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of notable people who regularly wear spandex[edit]

Tried prod, author deleted. Total nonsense list, appears designed primarily to make fun of Lance Armstrong with the comment of "roughly 21 hours a day". Gromlakh (talk) 00:56, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete Obvious spam. Tavix (talk) 00:58, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per nom. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Corvus coronoides (talk • contribs) 01:25, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's not spam but obvious delete as joke / original research / nonsense list / inaccurate (I don't think Mike McCready was wearing spandex under all that flannel. --JayHenry (talk) 01:30, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Altairisfar _talk 01:56, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps does not qualify technically for speedy, but I'll push for a rapid delete given the unsourced controversial material about living persons. --Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 02:29, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Snowball delete as vandalism, maybe not quite a G2 but darn close. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 02:57, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Now how the heck is anyone going to verify this one, anyway? It's lists like these that have made Wikipedia an unfriendly venue for other, more serious list articles. 23skidoo (talk) 05:42, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete complete and total trash. JuJube (talk) 08:02, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as patent nonsense/vandalism/joke/hoax/attack page and WP:SNOW.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 14:17, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I find it hard to believe that anyone would create an article like this in good faith. It's just ridiculous. Speedy G1 tag remains on the article. We don't have to go through process just for the sake of it here; it just needs to be speedily deleted. I would delete this per WP:BLP alone.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 14:28, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.