Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of moods
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete per massive concensus. - Mgm|(talk) 21:12, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
List of moods[edit]
- List of moods (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
We don't need this unsourced list. Alexius08 (talk) 12:11, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I'm ashamed to say I get irritated to the point of going crazy when people misspell "aggravated". However, in a calm, detached, even enlightened moment, I note that nothing really links to this article, and that the links in the list are a random collection of stuff, occasionally related to the topic. Curious.
- By the way, the one page that does link to it, Talk:Linguistic modality, did so in a comment almost a year old, yet the article was created today. Was this deleted before? Rklear (talk) 13:15, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- BJAODN and delete. Tohd8BohaithuGh1 (talk) 15:02, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, indiscriminate orphan list that doesn't have any boundaries set. Not useful. - Mgm|(talk) 15:46, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Wikipedia is not a fridge. VG ☎ 16:19, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete under G7. Author blanked the page here. MSGJ 16:39, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Must have been a test page of something --Numyht (talk) 17:20, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.