Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of models with the most Vogue covers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 01:47, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of models with the most Vogue covers[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't really think that the number of covers for a magazine a model gets is a defining characteristic of their career. Only source is a forum. Not really encyclopedic. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 23:59, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete per nom and WP:OR as well. Where are these numbers coming from? They don't even agree with the forum list, which is itself not a reliable source (e.g. Gisele Bündchen is credited with 118 there and 125 on this list). What a hot mess posing as a suitable Wikipedia page. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:19, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:01, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:01, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:01, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE - Per above arguments - frankly a waste of Wikipedia space. Mabalu (talk) 02:21, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above but mainly per Mabalu - frankly a waste of Wikipedia space. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 22:37, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - I'd like sources for this, but if these are reliable numbers, I think the information could find a place on List of Vogue cover models, which is a hot mess in and of itself and I have no idea what they were going for with the formatting, but this is information that people find interesting. I don't think we need to delete the information from wikipedia. However, I don't think it needs its own page. Bali88 (talk) 21:44, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.