Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of miscellaneous All My Children couples

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 08:28, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of miscellaneous All My Children couples[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an unnecessary article. It is a list of mostly current couples that appear on the soap All My Children and is entirely filled with plot. There are no sources. Additionally, a page like this could become massive with no set parameters other than being a couple on the show. The show is 40 or so years old and there are hundreds and hundreds of miscellaneous couples that could be included. AniMate 16:32, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Article was formed by a sock puppet. The article itself is a mass of storylines and no real world information. Written asif these are famous real world couples. As this is fancruft, it is looking asif it is a All My Children's fan page. With no notablity and characters mentioned in the article already having their own stand alone articles, there is no need for this.RaintheOne ^BAM 16:38, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 17:45, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 17:45, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:09, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - wikipedia articles are WP:NOT plot summaries or an in-universe description of fictional details. Shooterwalker (talk) 00:21, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Much of the material in the article has been plagiarized from soap central Wlmg (talk) 21:38, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I tend to think we should keep lists of characters. But "couples" is an arbitrary way to do it and Wikipedia would become a mess of original research and plot summaries if this became the norm. Dzlife (talk) 14:02, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.