Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of look-alike porn stars
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. AndyZ 21:16, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
List of look-alike porn stars[edit]
Tagged for AfD by an anon. I'm finishing the process. Looks like original research and wishful thinking. Maybe these women look similar to someone with beer goggles on, but not me. Brian G. Crawford 22:44, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. (I was the one who originally {{prod}} tagged this.) This list is hardly notable and it isn't information that couldn't be added to the pages of the porn stars themselves. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. Think out loud 23:47, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete original research. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 00:08, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete If you want to call it "research." —Larry V (talk) 02:18, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. OR. youngamerican (talk) 02:24, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. OR. Scranchuse 04:35, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This is very close to {{nocontext}}. Look-alike by whose standard?
- Delete. completely subjective "original research"--Outlander 14:11, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not notable; original "research". ElTchanggo 19:29, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, speedyable liscruft. Pavel Vozenilek 20:51, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.