Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of films produced and released by Black Sheep Productions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 18:57, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

List of films produced and released by Black Sheep Productions[edit]

List of films produced and released by Black Sheep Productions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Black Sheep Productions
Black Sheep Productions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

SPA account removed Speedy Delete tag, so I am taking it here to AfD to get consensus on whether the article should stay or go. Personally, I think it does not meet the WP:CORP requirements. Capt. Milokan (talk) 09:28, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:21, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:21, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete. Speedy tags can't be removed like that and we shouldn't reward it with process. – Finnusertop (talkcontribs) 10:25, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. I've combined the AFD for the parent article Black Sheep Productions with this list (there was no discussion yet at the other nomination); this should have been bundled together as the content is interdependent. postdlf (talk) 13:34, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete. A7/G11, per Finnusertop. Cabayi (talk) 14:56, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: I could find a good number of hits in Google news, but all were just mentions, none with enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 15:39, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete both per nom and Postdif. SpinningSpark 16:09, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete both per nom and WP:NCORP/WP:NOTCATALOGUE. Ajf773 (talk) 18:38, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • NeutralDelete both (possibly speedy) ... having added the missing Template:Find sources AFD for Black Sheep Productions I observe hits for the name from Google Books that are currently unexplained, however I believe they refer to different entities than the current article content refers to. In the unlikely event the article is not deleted it is likely the current article name requires a change to something more specific.Djm-leighpark (talk) 22:41, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've take a look at the removal of the speedy on the article and my opinion is simply persisting re-instating the speedy removed by the creator and templating up though to warning level four should have been sufficient to get them blocked rather than coming to AfD. The discussion on the various uses of Black Sheep Productions should be an indicator to the next person creating an article under this name that is should be created as a more specific name and not try to claim the primary topic. I'm normally wouldn't have been here except for the Find sources AFD but as I am here I concur with delete justifications and will go with those rather than remaining neutral.Djm-leighpark (talk) 16:11, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.