Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of films made in Omaha, Nebraska
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —Kurykh 03:59, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
List of films made in Omaha, Nebraska[edit]
- List of films made in Omaha, Nebraska (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Completely arbitrary list. Films can be made anywhere, there's really nothing special about Omaha. Bulldog123 14:26, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as nom Bulldog123 14:27, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:NOT, WP:NOR, WP:TRIVIA Rackabello 14:32, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as part of Category:Lists of films by location. Not seeing any reason for singling out Omaha's list. Otto4711 17:09, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and consider some of the other "List of films made in _____" articles as well. I agree that there could be significance to where a film was set (which is what many of the articles in the category to which Otto4711 document) but grouping films by where they were made is mere trivia. GassyGuy 18:06, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- While WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS isn't an excuse, Category:Films by location indicates that grouping films by shooting location is fairly commonplace. Otto4711 20:59, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- You misread. Category:Films by location is film settings not "filmed in." No, it's not part of the group. Bulldog123 21:30, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Look again. Category:Films by location contains subcategories for films shot in Oregon, Texas, Florida, Kentucky, Las Vegas, Maryland, Mauritania, Montana, Montreal, Morocco, New Orleans, Oklahoma, Toronto, Utah and Wisconsin. And Category:Films by shooting location contains subcategories for Brighton, Bulgaria, Chicago, Idaho, Malta, Melbourne, Mexico and Poland. Otto4711 22:02, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletions. -- -- pb30<talk> 15:26, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and because films are made a little here and a little there, so how much of the film needs be made in Omaha to be listed? There's no context to tell us. I do believe "set in" is a valid basis for film listings, but "shot in", "made in", "filmed in" lists don't make sense to me. Carlossuarez46 23:13, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete because Wikipedia is not a directory. There is nothing to indicate any significance about these films having been filmed in Omaha, Nebraska. Was the town prominent in the film's story or the film's production, if at all? Who knows? The information is indiscriminate in definition. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 15:06, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nebraska-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 04:34, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.