Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of films featuring eclipses

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 02:00, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

List of films featuring eclipses[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This topic holds no significance whatsoever. What benefit exists to knowing what movies include eclipses? Why not list movies with thunderstorms or rainbows? Songwaters (talk) 01:42, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:NOTESAL: "One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources, per the above guidelines; notable list topics are appropriate for a stand-alone list." There are ten sources that talk about eclipses in films collectively and list examples, and Wikipedia can follow suit in consolidating the films and the common themes. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 03:32, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This list is legimate because of the quality of the references. When multiple reliable sources discuss films featuring eclipses, as they do, then it is entirely legitimate to create this list. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 03:37, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:07, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:07, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:07, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the topic has substantial coverage in multiple reliable sources already referenced in the article, passes WP:GNG, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 18:26, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per ~~WP:NOTSEAL~~ WP:NOTESAL as argued above. XOR'easter (talk) 19:31, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.