Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of films about bankers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:26, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of films about bankers[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:LISTN because the topic has not been discussed as a group or set by reliable sources. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:50, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:51, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:51, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:00, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:00, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. WP:LISTCRUFT Ajf773 (talk) 22:07, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The list as it stands isn't really a list of films about bankers per se as much as it's a list of films where there are characters that happen to be bankers. It's not the focal point of the movie, in other words. Even if the banking job were the focus of the film, there's really not any coverage to show that this is something overly noteworthy. In other words its not like say, LGBT representation in film, where there's enough coverage to justify an article like List of LGBT-related films. If there were enough sources I'd be all for an article about banking in film, but I just don't see it out there. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:40, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- I like WP:LISTCRUFT and possibly OR as Tokyogirl points out. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:18, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. For the reasons already stated above. Aoba47 (talk) 18:40, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.