Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of film crossovers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 19:49, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of film crossovers[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete, trivial list with a non-encyclopedic intersection. JBsupreme (talk) 14:51, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Seems quite an encylopedic intersection to me, wouldn't you mention it in the article on the series? Polarpanda (talk) 15:20, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There are a handful of needles in this haystack, but very few of them are the promised "film crossovers". This is one of the most useless lists I've ever seen on Wikipedia, and I have no idea why it stayed up so long. Case in point-- if you wanted to know which film combined both "King Kong" and "Godzilla", why would you want to sort through a list of every single film that featured either King Kong or Godzilla (but not both)? How dumb is that? (BTW, out of the 51 films listed, I think that #10 on that list, called "King Kong vs. Godzilla (1962)" might be a crossover, just a hunch). Not at all useful as a reference. If someone wants to make a list of crossover films, start over and do it right. Mandsford (talk) 15:26, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete ...rather pointless and does not live up to its name. A shorter list of true "crossovers" with a deeper explanation of those particular films might have some value, but even that is stetching the imagination —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.39.157.76 (talk) 16:06, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Trivial, useless and inappropriate list. B.Rossow · talk 17:20, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Too loose a criterion, no sources. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 18:06, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, mostly per the arguments put forth by Mandsford. RFerreira (talk) 02:15, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as this list has no verifiable definition in accordance with WP:Source list, without which it is just a collection of loosely assoicated of topics without any externally validated rationale for inclusion in Wikipedia. A verifable definition is also needed to demonstrate that it is not the product of original research. --Gavin Collins (talk|contribs) 22:18, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.