Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional characters frozen in cryogenic freeze
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 03:34, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
List of fictional characters frozen in cryogenic freeze[edit]
Trivia, grouping of unrelated characters, common trope in science fiction, WP:NOT indiscriminate. >Radiant< 11:57, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As per nom. There are pointless lists and then there's this list ... --Plumbago 13:13, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 16:36, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this is an article? BH (T|C) 02:09, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete A trivial list; WP:NOT applies here. Acalamari 18:43, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. DreamGuy 20:48, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Retool There is a difference between cryogenics in reality (which is the freezing of a dead person) and in fiction (where a living person is somehow frozen into "suspended animation" to be awakened later). In science fiction, it's the opposite of time travel, since it's a plot device to transport a character from the past to the present, or from present to future. Nor is the concept of the sleeping character a novel one -- Rip Van Winkle and Bellamy's "Looking Backward" used the idea before cryogenics came along. I agree that this doesn't really merit a separate list, but an article about the fictional use of suspended animation, cryogenics, etc. would be worthwhile, and the compilation of examples is a good start. Mandsford 23:06, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.