Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of female american guitarists

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete NAC. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 02:36, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of female american guitarists[edit]

This article is not exactly as advertised. What I think happened, if I might conjecture, is that someone decided to try and dodge the notability requirement by putting in what looked like a list in the new article log. This isn't a list, it's an article on a single person, and there is no particular assertion of notability on top of that. Tyrenon (talk) 01:10, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment If it truly was a long resourceful list, I would be saying speedy keep. But since the page doesn't live up to its name....I'm undecided on the article at this moment. Also, if the nominator knew about Wikipedia policies they would know that Wikipedia is not an advertising website.--The Legendary Sky Attacker 01:15, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply So would I. Were this a list, or even a clear attempt at a list that was visibly in progress, this wouldn't be here (yes, there is stuff I don't put up for deletion from the new article log). With that said, I know Wikipedia is not an advertising website, which is why I put it up here. The only reason a CSD didn't come to mind is that I suspect it would have ended up in here within 20 minutes anyway as self-promoters often manage to fight a self-promotion at least this far.Tyrenon (talk) 01:25, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
G2/A7 Non-notable. Given the way off-the-base title, I'd say G2 (test page). Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 01:24, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 02:28, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.