Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of educational institutions in Sikkim

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nom Withdrawn (non admin close) Beeblebrox (talk) 19:01, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of educational institutions in Sikkim[edit]

A list, with only 2 entries. Seems like simple "see also" links would do the job of this article. There's also a template {{Universities in Sikkim}} that gets the job done, so there is no need for this list. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:32, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. —Beeblebrox (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. —Beeblebrox (talk) 17:38, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —SpacemanSpiff (talk) 17:39, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Two entries do not constitute a list. Pahari Sahib 17:45, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The list is a part of Education in India article series - a state by state list, just look at List of educational institutions in Bihar and you'll see that the universities would only be a subset of this. The list needs to be developed to have value, not deleted. -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 17:53, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as above. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 18:05, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But there is a nav template that would be used at the bottom of each of these articles, doesn't that serve the same purpose? Beeblebrox (talk) 18:09, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The nav template takes you to this (and other articles in the series), no? -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 18:30, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article is now completely different than when I nominated it, withdrawing. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:01, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.