Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of dragons from Dragons: Rise Of Berk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ben – Salvidrim! · ✉ 14:27, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of dragons from Dragons: Rise Of Berk[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This AFD is for an article with a declined PROD by the main author. The list is a list of fictional components from a game of even questionable notability and for which we do not even yet have an article. Even if an article on the game were to be created, we would not include this detailed a list in that article per WP:VGSCOPE numbers 1, 5, 6, and 7. Even still, if for some reason that list were retained in the article, it would need secondary sourcing and be limited to summarizing the work. Izno (talk) 15:39, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Izno (talk) 15:39, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Izno (talk) 15:39, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This is the sort of WP:GAMECRUFT we wouldn't even allow in articles, let alone have an entire article of it. Complete failure of the WP:GNG. Sergecross73 msg me 16:36, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:GAMECRUFT. Fails WP:LISTN. Not a notability grouping. It's a list of dragons from a game that isn't even notable itself for a Wikipedia article. --The1337gamer (talk) 16:41, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per nom._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 20:01, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete if the game itself ain't notable, the dragons certainly ain't notable. Lepricavark (talk) 03:25, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I endorsed the PROD, remarking that a search turned up nothing on the game itself. I agree with all comments above.

I've just removed 21 links to DAB pages and some other bad links for the second time. Article creator had added them back. Narky Blert (talk) 09:49, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Clear case of WP:GAMECRUFT. Ajf773 (talk) 09:39, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:05, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above discussion. Aoba47 (talk) 19:54, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.