Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of countries that do not have freeways or expressways
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete with 75 % consensus. Punkmorten 00:30, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
List of countries that do not have freeways or expressways[edit]
There had been no edits since this list, which has only two countries and is unlikely to grow much more, was created three months ago. I put a prod tag on and it was removed without explanation a day later, so here we are. Daniel Case 14:47, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and expand. Three months is nothing. Honbicot 15:02, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It's basically a list of the two smallest countries in the world, and unlikely to grow, unless you can add Andorra. Fan1967 15:07, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and expand. --Terence Ong 15:35, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, I dunno, I like this list. Do Nauru, Tuvalu, Maldives have freeways? I'll add. -- Samir ∙ TC 15:40, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not encyclopedic. -- Alpha269 15:41, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as not encyclopedic. I hope each and every one of you voting to keep this is prepared to bring it up to Wikipedia standards if it is not deleted. Also, there's no evidence that User:Nintendude was notifed that yet another one of his efforts is up for deletion. I'll let him know. Brian G. Crawford 17:32, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. It can be inferred from the size of List of countries and outlying territories by area if people are really interested in this subject, which I doubt. See List of countries without an army for an example of a more valuable "List of countries that do not have" list. Шизомби 19:27, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, very pointless list that could grow only with the addition of the likes of Sealand. If that is encyclopedic, we'll have zillions of lists in the style of "_____ without a _____". Sandstein 20:04, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I like lists, but this one's just too arbitrary. dbtfztalk 20:55, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Sandstein. Reyk 21:17, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per well argued nomination. And per it's a worthless article. εγκυκλοπαίδεια* 23:11, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I'm very tempted to keep this just so as to add Blue Volkswagon Island Dlyons493 Talk 01:47, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- BJAODN - This made me laugh. Similar to the "List of IMAX thaters with trees at the back" article. - Hbdragon88 20:06, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.