Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of countries by motor vehicle production in the 2000s

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. As someone once told me "what you consider listcruft" could be of encyclopedic value to someone else", Aynwho there's not really been a sufficient rationale put forward as to why this fails LISTCRUFT & INFO, Anywho consensus is to keep (non-admin closure) –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 00:12, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of countries by motor vehicle production in the 2000s[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article should be deleted because it is unsourced and is WP:LISTCRUFT. It also fails WP:IINFO by being a extensive listing of statistics. -KAP03 (talk) 18:12, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Not unsourced (sourcing is identified in the article), not "cruft" but rather a legitimate industrial statistic recorded in reliable sources. --Arxiloxos (talk) 18:53, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Why is this article List of countries by motor vehicle production in the 2000s and List of countries by motor vehicle production in the 2010s separate articles? They could both be merged into a new article with a title such as List of countries by motor vehicle production by year because both articles are on the same subject. KAP03 (talk) 19:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Antepenultimate (talk) 20:20, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Antepenultimate (talk) 20:20, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. List is sourced, no reason is given why nominator considers it as WP:LISTCRUFT. --Jklamo (talk) 16:19, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:06, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:06, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Lot of coverage for this sort of thing. Encyclopedic information. Dream Focus 03:34, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.