Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of contemporary repertoire for guitar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:21, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of contemporary repertoire for guitar[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not for big lists of repertoire, especially when vaguely defined as "contemporary" and containing no citations. This page could theoretically contain thousands upon thousands of entries, as it is such a wide topic. Right now it currently consists of a bunch of redlinks of non-notable composers and listings of minor pieces by actual notable composers. Unlike a discography or a list of a person's works, large repertoire lists of a very popular instrument helps no one. Why? I Ask (talk) 19:19, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Why? I Ask (talk) 19:19, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:21, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
delete as indiscriminate. Mangoe (talk) 03:27, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete dubious scope. D4iNa4 (talk) 10:10, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTINDISCRIMINATE. Ajf773 (talk) 21:57, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.