Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of cities in Azerbaijan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist 03:08, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of cities in Azerbaijan[edit]

List of cities in Azerbaijan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreliable article. The only source does not back up the information it is supposed to back up. And a ghost town (Agdam) as city??? The Banner talk 23:39, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:20, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:20, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:20, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: yes the sourcing should be improved. But that's an argument for development not deletion. -- Taku (talk) 17:42, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep and update/copy edit. A valid and functional list article per WP:NOTDUP and WP:LISTPURP, with content that is easily verified. I have added a {{refimprove}} template atop the article and have added some sources to better verify content. Also, I removed the Agdam ghost town entry, which took about two seconds to accomplish. North America1000 22:55, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, per above, and no valid deletion reason given for a plainly valid article topic. Antepenultimate (talk) 02:28, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per WP:CLN. We have a truly enormous category system for cities within fooian jurisdiction. And we have categories for many lists of such cities. This is such a list. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:01, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Frankly, I don't like dumb lists, but this one seems OK. With good editing, it should improve with time. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 19:20, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Legit article which can be improved. No valid reason for delete. Ajf773 (talk) 09:57, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.