Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of children of vice presidents of the United States

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Vanamonde (Talk) 17:50, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of children of vice presidents of the United States[edit]

List of children of vice presidents of the United States (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most vice presidential children are not notable in their own right. Interstellarity (talk) 23:43, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I replied to the wrong person, sorry Alexcs114 (talk) 07:45, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Godtres (talk) 11:37, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I question when this would be useful. The overwhelming majority of Vice President’s children aren’t terribly important or are known for other things. TheRealJT1743 (talk) 22:32, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Discussion about whether WP:NLIST is met might be helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:39, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep per Carrite. I don't see any reason to delete this. WP:NOTINHERITED doesn't apply here because this is a list rather than a specific child. JML1148 (talk &#124 contribs) 06:46, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, There are children of the vice presidents of the United States who have had their own successful careers. Davidgoodheart (talk) 00:55, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep While this is a list of non-entities of only regional or ancestral interest, I agree that this kind of odd list does no harm and has enough links on it that a user unfortunate enough to land on this article might use it to get to an article is actually useful to humankind.Rick Jelliffe (talk) 01:02, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.