Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of celebrities with natural breasts implants

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedily deleted A1 and A3 in WP:CSD. Oh, and breastcruft. There, I said it. Just zis Guy you know? 14:02, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of celebrities with natural breasts implants[edit]

Surprisingly, NOT by User:Nintendude, but still a useless, unverifiable (resisting the obvious joke) list. Calton | Talk 05:48, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

LOL --mboverload 05:52, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I fail to see how any type of breast implant could be natural. Jude (talk,contribs,email) 05:53, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, it can, using ones own fat from another place. But we do not need a list in pretty much anything someone can think of that might of interest for some people.Kim van der Linde ^{at venus} 05:54, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
"Natural breast implants"? Delete solely on the obvious oxymoronic quality of the phrase. TheProject 05:54, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It's not exactly clear what a natural breast implant would be. Brian G. Crawford 06:17, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Tijuana Brass^¡Épa!-E@ 06:33, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WTF? Is it a list about natural breasts or implants? Make up your mind! CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 06:34, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. What are "natural" breast implants anyhow? This is a near-BJAODN, but no cigar. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 06:36, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: they're real, and they're spectacular. -- GWO
Delete as a useless list. Kevin 11:45, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - incomprehnsible title, useless topic. 23skidoo 13:32, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per WP:CSD A1; the article makes no attempt to explain its self-contradictory title. --Metropolitan90 13:34, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.