Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of cars available in India

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 20:12, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of cars available in India[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Last AFDed in 2005, kept solely on the strength of WP:ITSUSEFUL arguments. --Divebomb is not British 14:39, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Its useful, doing no harm, and much better done than the companion "Cars in Pakistan" article. Rocco Lampone 75 (talk) 15:38, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment You do realize "It's useful" and "It's harmless" arguments are practically worthless here on Wikipedia, right? ----Divebomb is not British 17:32, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, well, the article is also not "indiscriminate" information. The information contained is very discriminate. It's a detailed, coherent, and has rational standards for inclusion. Besides that, I find your supercilious tone to be a bit off-putting, sir. Rocco Lampone 75 (talk) 18:17, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 21:46, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 21:46, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I dont know what sentence/word say that we should not have this kind of list in WP:INDISCRIMINATE? If we can have list of malls, what issue here? please elaborate more to understand why this has been nominated here. KuwarOnline ^Talk 06:49, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. cab (call) 07:46, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: WP:IINFO ("long and sprawling lists of statistics"), almost completely lacking in sourcing. No formal definition of "available". Emphasis on current vehicles is both unencyclopaedic, and would make maintenance a nightmare. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 08:09, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This kinda list would possibly be even harder to maintain than List of cars available in pakistan. NotARealWord (talk) 14:52, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, previous AfD is Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of car models available in India. NotARealWord (talk) 15:56, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unsourced triva, and unverifiable - what makes a car "available"? And it's not even of sufficient quality to keep as a stub. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:02, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I'm having a hard time reconciling this with your !votes at the shopping mall AFDs. What exactly makes them different from this? ----Divebomb is not British 14:40, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - You know what? I got mixed up here and was looking at List of cars available in pakistan when I wrote that comment, so I'm not surprised you found my !vote somewhat confusing - I've struck it now. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:33, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. An unsourced list with an unencyclopedicly broad scope. Eluchil404 (talk) 22:30, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.