Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of bridges and tunnels in Dubai

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep as per WP:N. Non-admin closure. SeanMD80^{talk | contribs} 19:32, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of bridges and tunnels in Dubai[edit]

Why is this notable? Delete, bridges themselves or tunnels are not notable Hell in a Bucket (talk) 16:10, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The specific bridges and tunnels on this particular list appear to be notable. --Pontificalibus (talk) 16:36, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:24, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:24, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - informative list that includes significant information over a category. I see no reason for deletion. TerriersFan (talk) 17:34, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - individual items in a list don't have to be notable to make the list as a whole notable, and the concept as a whole (major road features in a sufficiently large area) is, in my opinion, notable in most cases, including this one. --ThaddeusB (talk) 18:39, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Useful navigation list, just like the dozens of others like it —G716 <^T·_C> 19:10, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
keep as a proper subcat of parent Category:Lists of bridges. Nomination is false in any case: various bridges in the list are WP notable: they have articles. Hmains (talk) 20:53, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep notable. Tavix | Talk 22:33, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, a well structured encyclopaedic list. Could do with some more references, but that's not an AfD issue. Thryduulf (talk) 23:58, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Appropriate list, and, by the by, most named bridges and tunnels are indeed individually notable as is our consistent practice here .DGG (talk) 04:14, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.