Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of bands with repetitive names

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was SP DELETE (sole contrib's request and no keep votes) . -Doc ^ask? 22:43, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of bands with repetitive names[edit]

I believe the list is too specific under Wikipedia:appropriate topics for lists Matt 03:05, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This one I think should go. Simply having the same word appear twice in a name isn't an appropriate criterion for a list.Cheapestcostavoider 06:15, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, delete, delete. Why on Earth do we need a list of bands with repetitive names? Why on Earth do we need a list of bands with repetitive names? -AED 06:35, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per Cheapestcostavoider. RexNL 10:01, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete listcruft -Doc ^ask? 12:53, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, listcruft, unencyclopedic. --Ter e nc e Ong 15:09, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. The current form is non-encyclopedic listcruft, but it could be strictened to only allow band names that only consist of repeated words. JIP | Talk 16:15, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete listcruft listcruft listcruft. How many times do I have to repeat it? Fishhead64 19:42, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A bit useless since it focuses on name only and not on name origins/musical sound/anything more useful. Skabat169 20:27, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as listcruft. The El Reyko 21:37, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete as ridiculous listcruft. Whoever created this is clearly a moron. dbtfz ^talk 22:09, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As much as I hate this list, we don't need personal attacks --Doc ^ask? 22:12, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

He started the list and is making fun of himself --Matt 22:21, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, but that wan't obvious. But even after he created this awful thing, I wouldn't like to call him a moron. :)--Doc ^ask? 22:26, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I was just being silly. My "strong delete" is serious, though. (What was I thinking?) dbtfz ^talk 22:39, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.