Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of awards and nominations received by Jennylyn Mercado

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 17:55, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of awards and nominations received by Jennylyn Mercado[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Totally unsourced fancruft-article listing awards and nominations allegedly received by a Filipino celebrity. If there had been at least some sources/references in the article it could have been merged with the main article, Jennylyn Mercado, but as it is, with not a single source/reference for anything, there's nothing to merge. Thomas.W ^{talk to me} 13:52, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unsourced WP:BLP violation. --DAJF (talk) 14:02, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:35, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:35, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:35, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, as nomination and deletion arguments are invalid per my comments here in another, completely identical AFD started by the same editor (also with identical delete !vote from the same second editor). postdlf (talk) 23:22, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:33, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Or merge to Jennylyn Mercado if, as postdlf claims, there's something verifiable here. Nwlaw63 (talk) 18:47, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.