Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of awards and nominations received by Feist

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:20, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of awards and nominations received by Feist[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Her 8 Juno awards are hardly worth a complete separate article. Per nosplit guideline any interesting/notable wins can be indicated at the mainpage. Sandman888 (talk) 20:43, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, the nom misrepresents the size of the article, which in addition to "8 Juno awards" includes many nominations, all for notable awards. This list is clearly too substantial to be incorporated into the main article, and I don't see anything that should be trimmed out of it. See List of awards and nominations received by Pearl Jam, a featured list, for comparison; the Feist list is formatted in the same way and follows the same standard of inclusion by listing nominations for notable awards as well as wins. postdlf (talk) 22:51, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- And now I just noticed that THIS list is a featured list. Sandman888, I think the only proper thing to do is withdraw your nomination. postdlf (talk) 22:56, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- 1) being featured doesnt matter and is no bar for deletion. 2) see Good Charlotte for a similar sized list of awards which is in the main article after consensus deemed List of awards and nominations received by Good Charlotte was a content fork. Sandman888 (talk) 06:59, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sufficient content to merit a separate article. --Michig (talk) 06:03, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. There's no point in trying to delete a featured list while it is featured. That would mean we were trying to delete a page that is supposedly one of Wikipedia's best. If one believes the list is not only unworthy of being featured, but also unworthy of being on Wikipedia at all, first get it to be un-featured, and then come back to AfD to get it deleted. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 00:05, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's a featured list. Edward321 (talk) 15:35, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:02, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:02, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This seems a bit WP:POINTy, given past discussions on such topics. Lists that break content out from an article are spinouts, not content forks. Plenty of sources, good length, featured list, etc. Jclemens (talk) 02:41, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Feist. The list is OK but has its place in the main article. Sorry, Feist. ᴳᴿᴲᴳᴼᴿᴵᴷ☺ᶤᶯᵈᶸᶩᶢᵉ 14:17, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.