Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of artists who reached number one on the New Zealand Singles Chart
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:37, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
List of artists who reached number one on the New Zealand Singles Chart[edit]
- List of artists who reached number one on the New Zealand Singles Chart (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This list does not appear to be genuine. The references cited do not support the content, the content is incomplete (several artists I remember being at #1 on the main pop charts are not included) and an earlier page under a similar title by the same author was deleted after having been found to be a copy and paste from List of artists who reached number one on the Australian singles chart. The artists missing are mostly local New Zealand artists which makes me suspect the same has happened again. Daveosaurus (talk) 07:59, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. —Daveosaurus (talk) 08:05, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This user has been warned repeatedly for failing to abide by wiki guidelines and I seriously doubt that any attempt by them to create any version of this article is going to be reliable. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 08:22, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No references, and I am concerned about the accuracy of information. Adabow (talk · contribs) 10:36, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per the spirit of WP:NOT. WP is rife with all sorts of lists. We need a policy or guideline on what constitutes the sort of list that should be allowed on WP. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 10:43, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per above. Mostly wanted to chime in that the idea of a policy on lists is a brilliant idea -- I feel like I run into questionable lists pretty frequently. GorillaWarfare talk 14:24, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Snowball deleteas bogus list. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 14:58, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:04, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:04, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.