Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of animated science-fiction/fantasy movies that failed to attract an audience

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Article was created by user with history of (re)creating delete-able articles. Since there seems to be a massive concensus on this, I will apply WP:SNOW and speedily close this as a delete. - Mgm|^(talk) 09:16, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of animated science-fiction/fantasy movies that failed to attract an audience[edit]

The article looks horrid, but even if it didn't, there's simply no way this can pass WP:NPOV, not to mention WP:NOT. Danny Lilithborne 01:25, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet Jebus Delete this NPOV-a-palooza before it gets off the ground. --InShaneee 01:28, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. what the hell? Bwithh 01:41, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, but submit the title to WP:BJAODN. It's beyond funny. YechielMan 01:53, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for many reasons: POV, NOTABILITY, VERIFY, etc. Arbusto 02:11, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per everyone. Oddly, the article states, "There are only five movies that failed to attract audiences." Apparently this article comes from an alternate universe in which Kaena: The Prophecy and Rock & Rule (among many others) were big hits. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 02:13, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Maxamegalon2000 02:25, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Not only fails WP:NPOV and WP:V, but it's also little more than a gallery of images which also fails of the WP:NOTs. 23skidoo 03:53, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Holy god delete What the frick....UberCryxic 04:32, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
In the name of Kali, DESTROY. Whatever it is, it must die so that the Wikipedia may experience rebirth. Herostratus 05:50, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
WP:SNOW I needed a good laugh, thanks guys. --Roninbk _{t c #} 07:10, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete Article is POV, OR, unverified and factually incorrect. All of those movies attracted an audience, some even quite a large one. Mgm|^(talk) 09:12, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.