Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Wyze products

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Wyze Labs, Inc.. Missvain (talk) 03:25, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of Wyze products[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Highly promotional article that is a blatant violation of WP:NOTCATALOG and WP:NOTBROCHURE.

Per WP:NOTCATALOG "Encyclopedic significance may be indicated if mainstream media sources (not just product reviews) provide commentary on these details instead of just passing mention". This article fails that test, as its sources are all either product reviews or the company's own website. Tdl1060 (talk) 07:19, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Tdl1060 (talk) 07:19, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. Tdl1060 (talk) 07:19, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Many of the sources cited were product announcements, not just product reviews. This topic is notable and I do not believe it violates WP:CATALOG because it is providing clearly encyclopedic information about the products. I also don't see your argument about WP:BROCHURE because this article has a neutral tone and is not promoting any product. The core argument is whether this article is notable or not, it clearly is. Andrew nyr (talk, contribs) 07:36, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, I believe that the third step in the AfD process was flat-out ignored in this case. "Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted." Please read WP:BEFORE.

Another point, per WP:PRODUCT "If a company is notable, information on its products and services should generally be included in the article on the company itself, unless the company article is so large that this would make the article unwieldy." This clearly satisfies that. Andrew nyr (talk, contribs) 07:46, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Per previous points, if deemed not notable, information should be atleast merged into the main Wyze article because it is easily encyclopedic. Andrew nyr (talk, contribs) 07:55, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The notability of Wyze Labs itself is a separate issue that itself is questionable. Nevertheless, it is true that information on Wyze Labs' products could be included in its article. Its article is barely more than a stub, making this article completely unwarranted. However, the product information that is in this article and was in the Wyze Labs article before I removed it is highly promotional in tone and contains product availability and pricing information, thus violating WP:NOTCATALOG and WP:NOTBROCHURE.--Tdl1060 (talk) 08:16, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 08:22, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTCATALOGUE. This is merely a list of products made by the company, none of which are notable themselves. Ajf773 (talk) 09:23, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Wyze Labs, Inc. per above. NavjotSR (talk) 16:08, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:41, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 04:48, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTCATALOG, it is just a list of products.David (talk) 14:34, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose deletion per Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion. I have not done a detailed search for sources so will not comment on whether this topic passes Wikipedia:Notability#Stand-alone lists, which says, "One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources, per the above guidelines; notable list topics are appropriate for a stand-alone list."
List of Wyze products can be merged to Wyze Labs, Inc.#Products if the topic is determined to be non-notable.
Cunard (talk) 09:34, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Wyze Labs, Inc. per above arguments. MagPlex ^{(talk · contribs)} 09:18, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Wyze Labs, Inc. Dtaylor05 (talk) 15:20, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.