Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of US Presidents during the reign of Queen Victoria

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Scientizzle 15:33, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of US Presidents during the reign of Queen Victoria[edit]

unneeded list as all it does is give the years of different presidents during the reign of a Queen. The presidents have nothing to do with Queen Victoria and fails WP:LIST. Tavix (talk) 04:11, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:INDISCRIMINATE Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 05:24, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

unnecessary list, speedy delete.^MY♥_INchile 06:19, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- it's a list that serves no useful purpose. What's next, a list of volcanic eruptions during the interminable reign of Pepi II? Reyk _YO! 08:56, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - aha - there is a WP policy that covers this sort of probably well-intentioned but pointless list CultureDrone (talk) 11:48, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unnecessary list. Neat idea, though...--Paul McDonald (talk) 12:33, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

nah not so neat.^MY♥_INchile 18:14, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - It is a grand example of Wikipedia work, just like Amiens Cathedral is a grand example of Gothic architecture. Tharnton345 (talk) 13:43, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be sad if this is deleted. Tharnton345 (talk) 13:48, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's true! Tharnton345 (talk) 13:51, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do not delete it. Tharnton345 (talk) 13:51, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I mean it. Tharnton345 (talk) 13:51, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Please avoid from using ILIKEIT arguments, if you want the article kept instead use guidelines to explain it and not just that you like the article. Tavix (talk) 22:56, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Probably violates WP:NOTDIRECTORY Advocate 04:39, 5 August 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Advocate70 (talk • contribs)
- Keep - This should be deleted, not my not-to-be-deleted Wondurful page. Tharnton345 (talk) 05:41, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.