Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of USAF Fighter Wings assigned to Strategic Air Command
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep Jclemens (talk) 06:20, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
List of USAF Fighter Wings assigned to Strategic Air Command[edit]
- List of USAF Fighter Wings assigned to Strategic Air Command (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Unreferenced list of barely notable details all of which are at the individual wing articles Buckshot06(prof) 14:15, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. —Buckshot06(prof) 14:17, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Satisfies WP:LIST; it's helpful for navigation, and it's useful to have this information all in one place so readers don't have to go to each of the linked articles to get it. The fact that it's unreferenced is a reason for it to be edited, not deleted. Baileypalblue (talk) 20:29, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:40, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Baileypalblue. Spinach Monster (talk) 02:08, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Sure, the individual articles provide the info, but do we expect someone to know what wings are assigned to the SAC so that he can find all those individual articles? That's what a list is there for. As WP:LIST says, "Lists are commonly used in Wikipedia to organize information". This one seems to me to be serving exactly that purpose. Chamal talk 03:45, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.