Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Starlux Airlines destinations

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merged to Starlux Airlines. bd2412 T 21:14, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of Starlux Airlines destinations[edit]

List of Starlux Airlines destinations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

At this point, they have apparently one route only, from Taipei to Taichung. Everything else is planned for the future.There is no need for a separate article. DGG ( talk ) 10:10, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:26, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:26, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge I would have gone with a bold merge, myself. Not enough for a standalone. SportingFlyer T·C 11:06, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I understand your point of view, but if we do put it in the airline’s article, we will never know if it’s ready to stand alone. Through the process, there are potential risk of losing data or adding false informations. These informations are relevant and were announced by the chairman of the airlines which I think make these informations at least reliable. Andrew20070223 User talk:Andrew20070223· 14:33, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy WP:BOLD merge per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Shaheen Air destinations. Obviously doesn't need a standalone article but worth mentioning in the main. Reywas92Talk 17:54, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.