Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Spectrobes (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 05:57, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of Spectrobes[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I think this list article falls squarely under the WP:VGSCOPE criteria for inappropriate content ("lists of gameplay items...") Marasmusine (talk) 13:25, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) Marasmusine (talk) 13:25, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. While List of Pokemon essentially does the same thing, it actually has content to link to, and acts as a directory of sort over the lists. None of these seem to be notable in any way, and this list would prove no use to anybody who doesn't know anything about the series. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 15:49, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:08, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- per WP:GAMEGUIDE, which advises Wikipedia to avoid miscellaneous lists of items in video games. Also this article fails WP:N because it contains no reliable, third-party sources. Finally, even if we were to ignore the failures of WP:NOT and WP:N, it should still be removed because it's actually totally useless as an article; there is no context for any of these items, and therefore no way for anyone who is already unfamiliar with the game to get any information out of it. For example, I have no idea what "Ziba" and "Genshi" mean in this context and no way of finding out from the article. Reyk _YO! 01:58, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.