Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of SkyClan Cats
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was deletion. If anyone is willing to transwiki, please contact me on my talk page and I would be happy to provide the deleted content to interested editors. RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 03:51, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
List of SkyClan Cats[edit]
- List of SkyClan Cats (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Same reason as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of ShadowClan Cats, fancruft, multiple tags, and should be deleted/transwikied. ~ Bella Swan 01:00, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, I agree with everything said by the nom. Cirt (talk) 04:06, 16 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]
- Keep for now --- See comments under List of other Warriors characters. Whole group of these should have been proposed as a group. Hobit (talk) 08:20, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. They should start their own wiki for this (e.g., Wookipedia). There certainly seems to be enough material for it, but this isn't the place for it (this is an encyclopedia). To the authors/maintainers, go check out wikia.com. Daniel Santos (talk) 08:34, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- delete non-notable. --Jack Merridew 10:14, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Violates a number of policies, primarily WP:N and WP:FICT. •97198 talk 14:58, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki to Warriors Wiki as we have with the other deleted pages. No reason for all this work to be lost simply becuase it dosen't fit Wikipedia when it will fit Warriors Wiki once it's split into the various character pages. Kitsufox(Fox's Den) 15:39, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- delete per WP:N and WP:FICT. Eusebeus (talk) 14:01, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete besides violating WP:N and WP:FICT, it also has absolutly NONE encyclopedic content at all. No External Links to prove the data. However, it just might fit in the Warriors wiki...Brownie10125 (talk) 17:52, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.