Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Sega Revolution Games

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Stifle (talk) 11:21, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of Sega Revolution Games[edit]

Almost definitely a hoax, searching Sega Revolution on google and google news turn up exactly ZERO hits, no rumors in gaming publications, no press releases, NOTHING. Article creator has been warned repeatedly for inserting unsourced information regarding a new Sega console into other articles. - 2 ... says you, says me 14:52, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Agree with nom. Also, the only non-video non-blog results I could find are along the lines of what would be included on the Nintendo Revolution's Virtual Channel. "Revolution" was the development title of the Wii. (Also, if Sega were to return to making consoles, the chances of a Mario title appearing it are less than zero.) DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 15:38, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Google News returns no hits, and Google returns mainly forum speculation and MySpace videos. If the Sega Revolution existed, it would have been covered in at least some mainstream sources by now, meaning that this page appears to be a hoax.--Unscented (talk) 16:20, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - obvious hoax, so tagged. Why would Nintendo release a Mario game exclusively on Sega's console? Why would a multi-platform Rock Band game be called "Sega Rockband"? Why would a Batman game be released exclusively in Japan? Above all, why would Sega use a name for their console which Nintendo had used only a few years earlier? Nothing adds up here, not at all. Zetawoof_(ζ) 21:16, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hoaxes don't technically qualify for speedy deletion. But damn, you stole my remark. Delete this article, in any case. —harej (talk) 01:57, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- If they're sufficiently obvious hoaxes, then they qualify for speedy deletion as vandalism. Exactly what qualifies as "sufficiently obvious" isn't clear, but it's my personal opinion that this one is - especially given that it's sourceless, and there's no article on the Sega Revolution. Zetawoof_(ζ) 05:55, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 03:18, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 03:18, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.