Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of RiffTrax

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Spartaz ^Humbug! 19:46, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of RiffTrax[edit]

This article is essentially a catalog of products sold by this company. Moving to AFD after prod was contested. Rtphokie (talk) 12:42, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:40, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete An interesting concept, but notability of list not established. ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:22, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- comment this AfD is on the List of RiffTrax, not RiffTrax themselves, so you may wish to clarify your statement (since with a WSJ article and more, the concept RiffTrax does seem notable and is not up for debate here) LinaMishima (talk) 21:39, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that makes sense. So shouldn't this be a sub article? I don't think it stand on its own (as the List's notability hasn't been established), but a list of would be useful to include another way in relation to the parent article. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:39, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep — Website is notable. List serves a purpose. Some famous personalities outside of RiffTrax have created commentaries. (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 05:00, 19 November 2008 (UTC))[reply]
Strong Keep The website is notable and the list is extremely helpful. With a weak and off-base rationale of, "This article is essentially a catalog of products sold by this company," will you also strike List of Xbox Live Arcade games and List of Virtual Console games (North America)? The rationale is very much a stretch. The article makes no mention of price, nor does it have any phrases that even remotely imply the list as an advertisement. SashaNein (talk) 17:11, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.