Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Pomodoro Technique software

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete. Non-admin speedy closure. Article already deleted through Speedy Deletion. Discussion has become moot. AddWittyNameHere (talk) 03:14, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of Pomodoro Technique software[edit]

List of Pomodoro Technique software (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article appears to be little more than a WP:LINKFARM. Merging to Pomodoro Technique may be an option, but then notable software should still be sourced for significance. DonIago (talk) 00:17, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as little has changed since the last AFD; in fact the previous incarnation of this article had more information than this one does. But still, this is just a list of links, with no independent notability expressed or implied. Soap 04:08, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete as G4. Jackmcbarn (talk) 16:56, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Soft delete and move to Draft per WP:PRESERVE. The descriptions and collection of tools may be useful as an starting point for some future editor wanting to research this class of software and writing a proper article section about it. As draft space is not indexed nor followed, there's no problem holding there a collection of external links. There are no problems with WP:BLP or WP:COPYVIO which would justify a hard delete to block the content from view. Diego (talk) 18:01, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: the article was already deleted under criteria CSD G4 before the AfD was closed. Elockid (Talk) 03:39, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.