Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of PlayStation games with CD audio tracks

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♠ 03:37, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of PlayStation games with CD audio tracks[edit]

List of PlayStation games with CD audio tracks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:LISTCRUFT. Trivial inclusion criteria composed of original research. Entirely unsourced and not a set that is covered by reliable independent sources thus failing WP:LISTN. The1337gamer (talk) 19:43, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. The1337gamer (talk) 19:51, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. The1337gamer (talk) 19:51, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom; I'm quite surprised that it's lasted 10 years despite containing nothing more than original research. Spiderone 13:39, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | Talk 03:50, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Interesting information from my point of view, but definitely does not meet WP notability standards, and is completely unverifiable due to the absence of coverage in reliable sources.--Martin IIIa (talk) 19:55, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - per the recent consensus to delete all the lists about PS2 game disc types. Sources don't cover this enough to make it verifiable. Sergecross73 msg me 15:42, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.