Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of PlayStation 3 games without trophy support
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Consensus is for deletion. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:29, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
List of PlayStation 3 games without trophy support[edit]
- List of PlayStation 3 games without trophy support (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is a very poor article. It is entirely sourced to a forum post, and a Google search suggests the topic is not notable, with all results being forum posts. Fails WP:N and WP:V. –Compassionate727 (T·C) 11:03, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, this is an unmaintainable list. shoy (reactions) 13:45, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, agree this is an unmaintainable list and unable to be merged into any other article. Garchy (talk) 14:06, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 23:53, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 23:53, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:LISTCRUFT and I think #7 of WP:NOTDIR would work here. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:56, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - This was one of many excessive lists related to the PS3 I redirected weeks back. It's another non-notable list that lacks to sources to properly document this. Sergecross73 msg me 14:30, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete – Trivial list. --The1337gamer (talk) 08:35, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - I find the information useful, but it of course needs proper sourcing. JonathanDP81 (talk | contribs) 15:37, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- WP:ITSUSEFUL is not a valid keep rationale. Sergecross73 msg me 19:27, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.