Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of OECD countries by road network size

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 18:10, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of OECD countries by road network size[edit]

List of OECD countries by road network size (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This seems a rather arbitrary list. We already have List of countries by road network size, but I don't see why there should be a list specific to 34 countries that are part of an organization not related to road works. Seems a rather indiscriminate list, to me. kelapstick(bainuu) 04:51, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:48, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete—per nom. I agree, it does seem rather indiscriminate. Imzadi 1979  12:32, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:55, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 20:28, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nominator's rationale. This appears to be an unnecessary subset of the main list. --Kinu t/c 20:39, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Per Nomination. Seems rather pointless. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 21:04, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, as per nom. Would likely set a bad precedent for other arbitrary lists for things in international organisation member states, so best avoided. QueenCake (talk) 21:17, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.