Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Neon Genesis Evangelion topics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Scientizzle 16:19, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of Neon Genesis Evangelion topics[edit]

Disputed prod. List is redundant to the navigational template {{Neon Genesis Evangelion}}. --Farix (Talk) 15:15, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as the person who originally prodded it. Note that it was validly deprodded because it previously survived an AfD (a long long time ago when AfD was still VfD); I didn't check thoroughly enough prior to prodding it; if I had, I'd've taken it to AfD myself. —Dino guy 1000 17:18, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Yamakiri ^T_C § 07-25-2008 • 17:31:25 17:31, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the template covers the same grounds. Redundant. Doceirias (talk) 18:07, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per others. Unnecessary. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 18:47, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Why did someone bother to make this to begin with? (the list, not this AFD)Westrim (talk) 20:32, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for being redundant to the NGE navigation template. NeoChaosX (talk, edits) 22:51, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete actually yes, delete this like the plague; it's redundant and all that really happens on it is crazed fanboys trying to add in Evangelion fanfic to the list, as if to justify it as "legitimate" ugh.--Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici (talk) 00:09, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment the old VfD states why it exists, because it predates categories, and existed to link articles together (like the template does now). 70.55.85.122 (talk) 05:46, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Willbyr (talk | contribs) 02:00, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment someone remember to archive the VfD since it's saved on the Talk Page. 70.55.85.122 (talk) 05:46, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete it replicates both the category and the navigation template, as such it's been rendered redundant by the development of the nav-template and the category system. Alternatively, histmerge into the template. 70.55.85.122 (talk) 05:49, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete certainly redundant to the templates. JuJube (talk) 13:06, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.