Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of National Film Award records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Michig (talk) 08:05, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of National Film Award records[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Looks like promotional. VagaboundWind (talk) 07:15, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - we have these for other awards (List of Academy Award records); NFA is India's top film awards, and the Indian film industry is huge, so a list of records is perfectly reasonable. —Мандичка^YO 😜 08:10, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:20, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:20, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:20, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:20, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep - Beyond any doubt it is notable. National Film Awards are India's prominent award ceremony and with this big industry, there is significant scope of developing the list. I don't understand why this was even nominated for an AfD. The nominator says "looks like promotional", but I do not see any promotional material here. We have similar list on other awards and with the amount of significance that NFA holds, I don't see any reason to delete it. — Yash! ^(Y) 14:51, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - NFA is regarded as the greatest film award organised in India. There's no promotional material in the list. Although it needs a bit of introduction in the lead, it doesn't deserve to be here. I think it needs to be closed with a "keep" decision, ASAP. --FrankBoy _CHITCHAT 12:50, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.