Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Most Viewed Porn Videos of All Time

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:01, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of Most Viewed Porn Videos of All Time[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I actually thought this could be a notable topic for an article, but looking it up on a search failed to find much (third-party) coverage about most viewed porn videos. The only relevant page I could actually find was, guess what, from PornHub. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 05:02, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I don't see how this can reliably be measured or therefore be an honest title. It seems to just promote the porn video sites listed. Fails WP:MADEUP. Blythwood (talk) 05:04, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 05:14, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 05:14, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a quick google search of the article title is very unhelpful. Yes there are results for this, but the results are primarily primary and are only site specific. Therefore I think this article might be original research Seasider91 (talk) 18:50, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Interesting idea, but this is just WP:OR. The lack of notability for any of the specific videos is a red flag that this would need substantial sources to establish clear encyclopedic significance. The BLP problems associated with celebrity sex tapes also require good sources. A single reliable, independent source would at least be a starting point, though, and I don't see it. Grayfell (talk) 00:27, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete too much WP:OR in there, reliability about actual viewership would be almost impossible based on a limited subset of "sites".--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 01:17, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unverifiable. This is basically OR, and we have no way of knowing how the view counts are generated. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 13:51, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Quite unlikely a solid encyclopedia article, it may have certain interests for viewers but this is unlikely solid enough yet. SwisterTwister talk 07:13, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Possibly a notable topic, but with ludicrously bad sourcing, and probably all wrong. WP:TNT. --Sammy1339 (talk) 15:06, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.