Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Lords Justices of Appeal of Northern Ireland

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:01, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of Lords Justices of Appeal of Northern Ireland[edit]

a meaningless list that has been here for four years with no sourcing, no context, and nothing to indicate why there should be an unlinked list here. Corvus cornix_talk 19:05, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. -- Redfarmer (talk) 19:17, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - can't see any reason why a separate article to list just three judges is needed. Gatoclass (talk) 19:19, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. None of the judges has his own article, nor even the court itself, so far as I can tell. Not even on the Wiki Ireland site. RJC ^Talk 08:12, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Very strong keep and possible merge - with List of High Court Judges of Northern Ireland and List of County Court Judges of Northern Ireland. Lack of sourcing is not a reason for deletion. Certainly this list is verifiable. There is both notability and verifiability. Context could easily be established. As for lack of an article for any of the judges so far, there is a possibility this may change and is not a reason for deletion. EJF (talk) 14:51, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions. —EJF (talk) 14:57, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Only took a few minutes to source. Merging sounds a good idea but there's no need to discuss that here - it's an editing decision not a deletion one. Phil Bridger (talk) 17:33, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Phil Bridger. There is a similar article for England and Wales. Bláthnaid 23:40, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Phil Bridger. Avruchtalk 03:40, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And expand, obviously. There must have been others at times, no reason to restrict this to incumbents. Also, could be combined in a "list of judges of northern ireland" Avruchtalk 03:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and expand. --Helenalex (talk) 09:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and expand; this really should be a historical list, of which the three listed now are current incumbents. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 00:44, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This is clearly a notable subject. Lawrence Cohen 23:03, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.