Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of John Lennon Trivia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. Mackensen (talk) 15:05, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of John Lennon Trivia[edit]

I have nominated this article because of the use of the word "trivia", which is defined by wiktionary as insignificant trifles of little importance, especially items of unimportant information. This puts the article in direct conflict with my understanding of the following Wikipedia guidelines:

Articles title assumes that the information therin is trivial, violating NPOV
If we are to assume that the articles information is indeed trivial then it is violating Imporance.
Finally being that a trivia list is inherintly a list of random facts, this article is in violation of What Wikipedia is not.

Some or all of the information in this artile may be good however, it should be integrated into proper places within established articles. For advice on how this may be accomplished you might want to look at: Wikipedia:Trivia and User:GK/On adding trivia to the main body of an article. The_stuart 17:48, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Prehaps a major cleanup and merge could be in order. Yanksox 17:52, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Cleanup and Merge back to John Lennon Not everything in this article is trivial. Some of it is and needs to go. Some of it is conspiracy theory but worthy of inclusion as such.--Nick Y. 18:19, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and delete per nom. Caveat lector 18:59, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep would be too big if merged. --MarsRover 04:29, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per User:MarsRover; cleanup and merge per User:Nick Y. doesn't seem possible due to size constraints otherwise I would agree with his proposal. Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:31, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.