Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Jewish organizations designated by the Southern Poverty Law Center as hate groups

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedily deleted per WP:A10. (non-admin closure) Hog Farm Bacon 22:09, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of Jewish organizations designated by the Southern Poverty Law Center as hate groups[edit]

List of Jewish organizations designated by the Southern Poverty Law Center as hate groups (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The list only contains two Jewish groups and they are already listed on List of organizations designated by the Southern Poverty Law Center as hate groups. I don't think the "list" serves a valid purpose. ImTheIP (talk) 19:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. ImTheIP (talk) 19:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Wow. Egregious WP:POVFORK. This is not a category of hate group used by the SPLC, so there would need to be some extraordinary sourcing treating this as a specific group. I see nothing like that outside of, you know, the websites of some of those other hate groups... — Rhododendrites talk \\ 20:10, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 20:13, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete A10 (Recently created article that duplicates an existing topic). Arbitrary POVFORK and hence OR. Completely unnecessary and serves absolutely no legitimate purpose. If it was contributed in good faith then the author needs clear and strong advice not to do anything like this again. If not, then they need to be blocked irrespective of whether their other edits are good. It is very hard to assume good faith here as the author as had made no attempt to create any similarly misguided articles for other religions. --DanielRigal (talk) 20:36, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I've nominated it for speedy deletion. While there is a discussion to be had about how to follow up on this I think that it is imperative to get it out of the article space as quickly as possible. --DanielRigal (talk) 20:41, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedied. Bishonen | tålk 21:10, 29 August 2020 (UTC).[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.