Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Jeff Dunham performances

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Jeff Dunham. (non-admin closure) Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:21, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of Jeff Dunham performances[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete per WP:NTOUR, which I think is applicable here. Without verification and discussion of the topic (in this case, these series of performances, not just some individual review), this does not pass the notability guidelines. In fact, there really are no references for anything here at all. Drmies (talk) 04:07, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:20, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:21, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:21, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Smerge basic tour info to Jeff Dunham, as of course the parent article should have something about his tours (regardless of whether they are individually notable) but there's no call for such bloated formatting and individual tour dates so as to take up a whole page with them. The lack of references at present is immaterial and not indicative of the verifiability of the basic information. postdlf (talk) 18:32, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge selectively - Agree it runs into problems with WP:NTOUR. --— Rhododendrites ^talk | 19:34, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge selectively to Jeff Dunham per the rationale of User:Postdlf and as a reasonable WP:ATD. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:39, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.